Visar inlägg från december 2012

The 10 biggest vaccine news stories of 2011

 org

Mike Adams
Natural News
December 31, 2011

(NaturalNews) A lot happened in the vaccine industry in 2011 — a year ofaccelerating change and increased awareness among the people. One of the big realizations that hit home in 2011 is that vaccines are far more dangerous than most people previously thought, and even conventional scientists are starting to question theover-vaccination of infants and children.

Here are the 10 biggest vaccine news stories of 2011, reported on NaturalNews.com:


#1 – Japanese children die from vaccines

Yet more evidence emerges of the deadly side effects of vaccines:
http://www.naturalnews.com/031616_v…


#2 – U.S. government recruits churches to push flu shots on congregation members

Take that flu shot, or you’ll go to Hell! That’s the new message the U.S. government is trying to pound into the heads of church pastors and priests:

http://www.naturalnews.com/034394_c…


#3 – Top CDC vaccine scientist indicted for fraud

You probably never read this story elsewhere, but one of the CDC’s top researchers was indicted for allegedly stealing vaccine research money and using it to buy fancy vehicles and a luxury home:
http://www.naturalnews.com/032216_T…


#4 – IOM admits MMR vaccines cause seizures and measles

In a groundbreaking report, the Institute of Medicine openly admitted that vaccines actually causethe very measles they claim to prevent. The mainstream media, of course, misreported this research and utterly failed to cover the real story.
http://www.naturalnews.com/033447_I…


#5 – CDC openly admits flu vaccines don’t work

Here’s news you don’t see every day: The CDC openly admits that vaccine flu shots “wear off,” meaning they simply do not work in the way vaccine-pushing immunologists told us they did.
http://www.naturalnews.com/032558_f…


#6 – Merck vaccine scientist Dr. Maurice Hilleman admits vaccines contain cancer-causing viruses

The actual admission happened decades ago, but news of it only went viral in 2011 as alternative news websites like NaturalNews publicized the once-secret audio recordings revealing shocking admissions by Dr. Maurice Hilleman.
http://www.naturalnews.com/033584_D…


#7 – HPV vaccines found contaminated with HPV!

Pretty clever, huh? Just lace the HPV vaccines with the DNA of HPV itself, and you can spread the disease to create more fear that sells more vaccines!
http://www.naturalnews.com/033585_G…


#8 – Swine flu vaccine admittedly causes neurological disorders

2011 was the year that the nation of Finland openly admitted on the record that swine flu vaccines “conclusively” cause neurological disorders. It then offered to pay the lifetime medical costs of those damaged by such vaccines.

Remember, the USA continues to absurdly claim that vaccines cause NO damage (not to anyone) and are perfectly safe for infants, children and even pregnant women!
http://www.naturalnews.com/033816_s…


#9 – Science says flu vaccines only work on 1 out of 100

Now, even the scientists can’t argue with their own science, can they? Rigorous studies published in peer-reviewed medical journals reveal that flu vaccines hardly work at all and are wasted on 98.5 out of 100 people who take them.
http://www.naturalnews.com/033998_i…


#10 – Hallmark caught distributing flu shot compliance cards to new moms

Yes, even the Hallmark card company is now pushing vaccines. Plotting alongside state agencies in Florida, Colorado and elsewhere, the company pushes out cutesy flu shot “compliance” cards that urge new moms to have their newborn babies injected with dozens of combination vaccines, complete with mercury and chemical adjuvants that cause neurological disorders:
http://www.naturalnews.com/034365_H…

Watch for more vaccine news in 2012 right here on NaturalNews.com

Ban Prozac And Other Mass Murder Drugs Not Guns!

Vectobac G mot mygg? Nej tack.

vks artikel(TT)

Detta är vad regeringen har godkänt för bekämpning mot myggor i Nedre Dalälven (Gävleborg).

En kort sammafattning av 2012 rapporte nedan: The information and recommendations contained herein are based upon tests believed to be reliable.  However, Valent BioSciences does not guarantee their accuracy or completeness nor shall any of this information...

 

Här är 100% av igridienserna till VectoBac G.
Ingridienser: (2.80%)
 
subspecies israelensis (är nog samma som: strain am 65-52, &: fermentation solids)
strain AM 65-52 (vad EFSA säger)
fermentation solids (bakterier?)
Spores (sporer)
insecticidal toxins (välj vad du vills läsa)
 
Other (97.20%)
 ????????????
 
Total (100%)
 
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS (gäller nog för djur med)
 
Do not contaminate water when cleaning equipment or disposing of equipment washwaters. Do not apply directly to treated, finished drinking water reservoirs or drinking water receptacles when the water is intended for human consumption.

 

 

                  MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET               PAGE 1  

VectoBac® G 
MSDS# BIO-0057 Rev. 5                                   ISSUED 01/02/12 
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
1.  CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION 
----------------------------------------------- 
MATERIAL NAME: VectoBac® G               
               EPA Registration No. 73049-10 
                
MANUFACTURER:  Valent BioSciences Corporation 
               870 Technology Way, Suite 100 
               Libertyville, Illinois  60048 
EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBERS 
Emergency Health or Spill:  
Outside the United States:  651-632-6184 
Within the United States:   877-315-9819 
2.  COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS 
------------------------------------------ 
  INGREDIENT NAME: Bacillus thuringiensis, subsp. israelensis 
    CONCENTRATION: 2.80 % 
CAS/RTECS NUMBERS: 68038-71-1 / N/A 
OSHA-PEL  8HR TWA: N/L 
             STEL: N/L 
          CEILING: N/L 
ACGIH-TLV 8HR TWA: N/L 
             STEL: N/L 
          CEILING: N/L 
OTHER     8HR TWA: N/A 
LIMITS       STEL: N/A 
          CEILING: N/A 
  INGREDIENT NAME: Inert Ingredients - identity withheld as a Trade  
                   Secret 
    CONCENTRATION: 97.20 % 
CAS/RTECS NUMBERS: N/A / N/A 
OSHA-PEL  8HR TWA: N/L 
             STEL: N/L 
          CEILING: N/L 
ACGIH-TLV 8HR TWA: N/L 
             STEL: N/L 
          CEILING: N/L 
OTHER     8HR TWA: N/A 
LIMITS       STEL: N/A 
          CEILING: N/A                 MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET               PAGE 2  
VectoBac® G 
MSDS# BIO-0057 Rev. 5                                   ISSUED 01/02/12 
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
2.  COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS, continued 
------------------------------------------ 
EEC (European Community): N/A 
      Symbol Designation: N/A 
            Risk Phrases: N/A 
          Safety Phrases: N/A 
3.  HAZARDS INFORMATION 
----------------------- 
EMERGENCY OVERVIEW: Product is non-toxic by ingestion, skin contact, or 
inhalation. Direct contact with eyes or skin may cause mild irritation. 
ROUTE(S) OF ENTRY:       Skin: No 
                   Inhalation: No 
                    Ingestion: No 
SKIN CONTACT: Non-irritant 
SKIN SENSITIZATION: N/D 
EYE CONTACT: Non-irritant 
TARGET ORGANS: N/D 
CARCINOGENICITY RATING: NTP: N/L  IARC: N/L  OSHA: N/L  ACGIH: N/L 
   None 
SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS: Direct contact with eyes or skin may cause mild  
   irritation. 
MEDICAL CONDITIONS AGGRAVATED BY EXPOSURE: N/D.                   MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET               PAGE 3  
VectoBac® G 
MSDS# BIO-0057 Rev. 5                                   ISSUED 01/02/12 
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
4.  FIRST AID MEASURES 
---------------------- 
EYES: Remove from source of exposure. Flush with copious amounts of  
   water. If irritation persists or signs of toxicity occur, seek  
   medical attention. Provide symptomatic/supportive care as  
   necessary. 
SKIN: Remove from source of exposure. Flush with copious amounts of  
   water. If irritation persists or signs of toxicity occur, seek  
   medical attention. Provide symptomatic/supportive care as  
   necessary. 
INGESTION: Remove from source of exposure. If signs of toxicity occur, 
   seek medical attention. Provide symptomatic/supportive care as  
   necessary. 
INHALATION: Remove from source of exposure. If signs of toxicity  
   occur, seek medical attention. Provide symptomatic/supportive care  
   as necessary. 
5.  FIRE FIGHTING PROCEDURES 
---------------------------- 
             FLASH POINT: N/A 
      FLASH POINT METHOD: N/D 
LOWER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT(%): N/D 
UPPER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT(%): N/D 
AUTOIGNITION TEMPERATURE: N/D 
FIRE & EXPLOSION HAZARDS: Non-flammable and no explosive properties. 
EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Use appropriate medium for underlying cause of  
   fire. 
FIRE FIGHTING INSTRUCTIONS: Wear protective clothing and self-contained 
   breathing apparatus. 
6.  ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES 
------------------------------- 
SPILL OR RELEASE PROCEDURES: Recover product. Place into appropriate  
   container for disposal. Avoid dust. Ventilate and wash spill area.                   MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET               PAGE 4  
VectoBac® G 
MSDS# BIO-0057 Rev. 5                                   ISSUED 01/02/12 
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
7.  HANDLING AND STORAGE 
------------------------ 
HANDLING: N/D. 
STORAGE: Store in a cool, dry place. 
SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS: N/A 
8.  EXPOSURE CONTROLS/PERSONAL PROTECTION 
----------------------------------------- 
ENGINEERING CONTROLS: Use local exhaust. 
RESPIRATORY PROTECTION: Not usually required. However, mixers/loaders and 
applicators not in enclosed cabs or aircraft must wear a dust/mist 
respirator meeting NIOSH standards of at least N-95, R-95 or P-95.  
SKIN PROTECTION: Impervious gloves, clothing to minimize skin contact. 
EYE PROTECTION: Not usually required. If necessary, use safety glasses or 
goggles. 
OTHER PROTECTION: Wash thoroughly with soap and water after handling. 
9.  PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES 
------------------------------------ 
APPEARANCE/PHYSICAL STATE: Granular solid. 
                     ODOR: Mild 
            BOILING POINT: N/A 
   MELTING/FREEZING POINT: N/A 
   VAPOR PRESSURE (mm Hg): N/A 
    VAPOR DENSITY (Air=1): N/A 
         EVAPORATION RATE: N/D 
             BULK DENSITY: 27 ± 4 lb/cu.ft.  
         SPECIFIC GRAVITY: N/D 
               SOLUBILITY: N/A 
                       pH: 5.4 ± 1.0 (10% slurry) 
                VISCOSITY: N/A                  MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET               PAGE 5  
VectoBac® G 
MSDS# BIO-0057 Rev. 5                                   ISSUED 01/02/12 
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
10. STABILITY AND REACTIVITY 
---------------------------- 
CHEMICAL STABILITY: Stable 
INCOMPATIBILITIES: Alkalinity inactivates product. 
HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: N/D. 
HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: Will not occur. 
11. TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION 
----------------------------- 
Acute Toxicity 
ORAL LD50: LD50 (rat) > 5,000 mg/kg  
DERMAL LD50: LD50 (rabbit) > 5,000 mg/kg  
INHALATION LC50: N/D. No lethality was observed in rats after a 4 hour 
exposure at the highest obtainable inhalation exposure chamber 
concentration (2.84 mg/l) to VectoBac® Technical Powder.  
CORROSIVENESS: N/D. Not expected to have any corrosive properties. 
DERMAL IRRITATION: N/D. Transient, slight or mild irritation noted in a 
dermal toxicity study with VectoBac® Technical Powder.  
OCULAR IRRITATION: N/D.  VectoBac® Technical Powder was mildly  
   irritating in an eye irritation test in rabbits. 
DERMAL SENSITIZATION: N/D 
SPECIAL TARGET ORGAN EFFECTS: N/D 
CARCINOGENICITY INFORMATION: N/D. None of the components are classified as 
carcinogens.                  MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET               PAGE 6  
VectoBac® G 
MSDS# BIO-0057 Rev. 5                                   ISSUED 01/02/12 
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
12. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION 
-------------------------- 
ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION: N/D 
13. DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS 
--------------------------- 
Do not contaminate potable water, food or feed by storage or disposal. 
Dispose of product in accordance with federal, state, and local 
regulations. 
WASTE DISPOSAL METHODS:
Pesticide Disposal:  Wastes resulting from use of this product may be 
disposed of on site or at an approved waste disposal facility. 
Container Disposal:  Completely empty bag into application equipment.  
Then dispose of empty bag in a sanitary landfill or by incineration, 
or, if allowed by State and local authorities, by burning.  If burned, 
stay out of smoke. 
14. TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION 
------------------------------ 
DOT           STATUS: Not Regulated 
PROPER SHIPPING NAME: N/A 
        HAZARD CLASS: N/A 
           UN NUMBER: N/A 
       PACKING GROUP: N/A 
 REPORTABLE QUANTITY: N/A 
IATA/ICA0     STATUS: Not Regulated 
PROPER SHIPPING NAME: N/A 
        HAZARD CLASS: N/A 
           UN NUMBER: N/A 
       PACKING GROUP: N/A 
 REPORTABLE QUANTITY: N/A 
IMO       STATUS: Not Regulated 
PROPER SHIPPING NAME: N/A 
        HAZARD CLASS: N/A 
           UN NUMBER: N/A 
       PACKING GROUP: N/A 
 REPORTABLE QUANTITY: N/A 
         FLASH POINT: N/A                  MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET               PAGE 7  
VectoBac® G 
MSDS# BIO-0057 Rev. 5                                   ISSUED 01/02/12 
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
15. REGULATORY INFORMATION 
-------------------------- 
TSCA STATUS: Exempt 
CERCLA STATUS: N/D 
SARA STATUS: N/D 
RCRA STATUS: N/D 
PROP 65 (CA): N/D 
16. OTHER INFORMATION 
--------------------- 
REASON FOR ISSUE:  MSDS Reviewed.  
APPROVAL DATE:     01/02/12 
SUPERSEDES DATE:   12/17/10 
   LEGEND: N/A = Not Applicable 
           N/D = Not Determined 
           N/L = Not Listed 
             L = Listed 
             C = Ceiling 
             S = Short-term 
               (R) = Registered Trademark of Valent BioSciences 
          (TM) = Registered Trademark of Valent BioSciences 
The information and recommendations contained herein are based upon  
tests believed to be reliable.  However, Valent BioSciences does not  
guarantee their accuracy or completeness nor shall any of this  
information constitute a warranty, whether expressed or implied, as to  
the safety of the goods, the merchantability of the goods, or the  
fitness of the goods for a particular purpose.  Adjustment to conform  
with actual conditions of usage may be required. Valent BioSciences  
assumes no responsibility for results obtained or for incidental or  
consequential damages arising from the use of these data.  No freedom  
from infringement of any patent, copyright or trademark is to be  
inferred. 
870 Technology Way, Suite 100 
Libertyville, IL 60048 – 800-323-9597    January 2012  © Valent BioSciences Corporation
 
En länk till en anna pdf från forshaga.se
 
 

 

Simple Health Secrets the Globalists Don’t Want You to Know: Full HD Special Report

Infowars.com
December 13, 2012

Pharmacist Ben Fuchs and Dr. Joel Wallach sit down for an extended discussion into how the pharmaceutical industry hijacked health in America.

Every War Starts With A False Flag Operation

Not Just Buses, Street Lights Are Also Recording Conversations

 Along with televisions, computers, cellphones and more

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
December 11, 2012

News that the government is set to expand the nationwide installation of surveillance bugs on buses that record conversations serves as a reminder that similar systems are also being readied for street lights, along with a host of other devices.

“Government officials are quietly installing sophisticated audio surveillance systems on public buses across the country to eavesdrop on passengers, according to documents obtained by The Daily. Plans to implement the technology are under way in cities from San Francisco to Hartford, Conn., and Eugene, Ore., to Columbus, Ohio.”

Michael Brick warns that the device will be able to, “transcribe the individual conversations of every passenger riding on a public bus,” at the behest of authorities adding that the DHS-funded project represents a horrendous affront to privacy laws.

However, as we have previously documented, buses are by no means the only place where big brother will not only be watching, but listening too.

As we first reported last year, high tech street lights with “homeland security applications” are now being installed in major U.S. cities.

press release put out by Amerlux earlier this year announced the company’s partnership with Illuminating Concepts to further advance the rollout of ‘Intellistreets’. The announcement confirms that the street lights will have a number of “homeland security features” including a loudspeaker system that will be used to “engage captive audiences”.

Not only can the street lights, now being rolled out in Detroit, Chicago and Pittsburgh with Department of Energy backing, act as surveillance cameras, Minority Report-style advertising hubs, and Homeland Security alert systems, they are “also capable of recording conversations,” according to a report by ABC 7.

According to the companies behind the system, Intellistreets spying hubs that double as street lights are expected to “become commonplace” not only on regular streets but also for “retail malls, sports venues, on college campuses, and in new construction.”

In addition to the Intellistreets system, gunshot detectors which have been installed in major cities for years are already recording public conversations.The ACLU responded by noting that, “It is not generally legal for law enforcement (or anyone else) to make audio recordings of conversations in which they are not a participant without a warrant.”

Televisions, computers and cellphones are also set to utilize technology that records conversations in order to bombard users with invasive targeted advertising. Verizon recently followed Google’s lead and officially filed a patent for a set-top box that will actively spy on Americans in their own homes.

In an article we published back in 2006, we highlighted the fact that, “Digital cable TV boxes, such as Scientific Atlanta, have had secret in-built microphones inside them since their inception in the late 1990′s.”

App providers on the Android network also now require users to agree to a condition that, “Allows the app to record audio with the microphone,” on cellphones and other ‘smart’ devices. “This permission allows the app to record audio at any time without your confirmation,” states the text of the agreement.

Virtually every new technological device now being manufactured that is linked to the Internet has the capability to record conversations and send them back to a central hub. Is it really any wonder therefore that former CIA director David Petraeus heralded the arrival of the “smart home” as a boon for “clandestine statecraft”?

People are now willingly planting bugs on their own property with scant regard for basic privacy considerations, while the world around them is also being turned into a 24/7 surveillance grid that outstrips Orwell’s worst nightmare – all in the name of convenience, safety and security.

Fukushima Fish have 258 Times ‘Safe’ Level of Radiation

 Lisa Garber

Infowars.com
Sept 12, 2012

[Editor's note: Earlier this year, it was reported researchers from Stanford University found cesium levels 10 times higher than those found in bluefin tuna from the years before the disaster.]

photo

The mainstream media is finished with Fukushima, but it seems Fukushima isn’t finished with us. A couple of irradiated fish captured near the inoperative nuclear plant showed 25,800 becquerels of caesium per kilo—258 times the level determined ‘safe’ by the government.

The plant ceased operations following a meltdown involving three reactors after the devastating earthquake and tsunami in March of 2011.

 

Radiation Spike in Fish

Since June, officials have allowed fishing outside a 31-mile radius from the plant while being purportedly stunned by the record radiation levels of the fish. Until the recently captured pair of greenlings, record radiation levels had been at 18,700 becquerels per kilo as found in cherry salmons. The Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) is intent on capturing more of and researching the fish, their food sources, as well as their habitats to explain the 7,100 becquerels jump.

Of course there is no ‘safe’ level of radiation, and food contaminated with high amounts of radiation can be especially dangerous. Not too long ago, it was found that radioactive food (food contaminated with radiation from Fukushima or others sources), is actually comparable to receiving hundreds of X-rays.

Radiation’s Wide Effects

Radiation cast an even wider net, however, than for fish alone. Butterflies with disfigured eyes, legs, and antennae and stunted wings have caught the eye of scientists and put fear in the hearts of locals. The Sixth Report of Fukushima Prefecture Health Management Survey has declared that 36 percent of Fukushima children have malformed thyroid growths and may develop cancer. Infants and young people are most endangered by radiation’s effects, according to the World Health Organization, because cellular division occurs faster.

Here is an extensive page all about radiation.

Protecting Yourself from Radiation

Fukushima plant operators have already admitted that the Fukushima radiation levels emitted from the disaster exceeds almost two and a half times the initial ‘estimate’ produced by Japanese safety regulators. Researchers have also stated that the amount of radioactive isotope caesium-137 released at the height of the crisis was equivalent to 42% of that from Chernobyl. This is cause for concern, and prompts a serious need for protection.

For now, it’s best to avoid certain varieties of fish from particular areas. Keep in mind that somecontaminated tuna have been found off the California coast.

Remember that no dose of radiation is safe and there are variables to consider when protecting yourself from it.

Additional Sources:

RT

This post originally appeared at Natural Society

Baby monkeys develop autism after routine CDC vaccinations

org.. 

Ethan A. Huff

Natural News
May 7, 2012

(NaturalNews) If vaccines play absolutely no role in the development of childhood autism, a claim made by many medical authorities today, then why are some of the most popular vaccines commonly administered to children demonstrably causing autism in animal primates? This is the question many people are now asking after a recent study conducted by scientists at the University of Pittsburgh (UP) in Pennsylvania revealed that many of the infant monkeys given standard doses of childhood vaccines as part of the new research developed autism symptoms.

For their analysis, Laura Hewitson and her colleagues at UP conducted the type of proper safety research on typical childhood vaccination schedules that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) should have conducted — but never has — for such regimens. And what this brave team discovered was groundbreaking, as it completely deconstructs the mainstream myth that vaccines are safe and pose no risk of autism.

Presented at the International Meeting for Autism Research (IMFAR) in London, England, the findings revealed that young macaque monkeys given the typical CDC-recommended vaccination schedule from the 1990s, and in appropriate doses for the monkeys’ sizes and ages, tended to develop autism symptoms. Their unvaccinated counterparts, on the other hand, developed no such symptoms, which points to a strong connection between vaccines and autism spectrum disorders.

Included in the mix were several vaccines containing the toxic additive Thimerosal, a mercury-based compound that has been phased out of some vaccines, but is still present in batch-size influenza vaccines and a few others. Also administered was the controversial measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine, which has been linked time and time again to causing autism and various other serious, and often irreversible, health problems in children (http://www.greenhealthwatch.com)

“This research underscores the critical need for more investigation into immunizations, mercury, and the alterations seen in autistic children,” said Lyn Redwood, director of SafeMinds, a public safety group working to expose the truth about vaccines and autism. “SafeMinds calls for large scale, unbiased studies that look at autism medical conditions and the effects of vaccines given as a regimen.”

 

 

Vaccine oversight needs to be taken from CDC and given to independent agency, says vaccine safety advocate

Adding to the sentiment, Theresa Wrangham, president of SafeMinds called out the CDC for failing to require proper safety studies of its recommended vaccination schedules. Unlike all other drugs, which must at least undergo a basic round of safety testing prior to approval and recommendation, vaccinations and vaccine schedules in particular do not have to be proven safe or effective before hitting the market.

“The full implications of this primate study await publication of the research in a scientific journal,” said Wrangham. “But we can say that it demonstrates how the CDC evaded their responsibility to investigate vaccine safety questions. Vaccine safety oversight should be removed from the CDC and given to an independent agency.”

Be sure to read this thorough analysis of the study by Catherine J. Frompovich of VacTruth.com:
http://vactruth.com/2012/04/29/monkeys-get-autism/

Sources for this article include:

http://vran.org

http://www.safeminds.org/

Almost half of Fukushima children now have thyroid disorders

org...

 

PF Louis
Natural News
December 3, 2012

Not much information comes out of Japan about Fukushima anymore, and the American MSM seems to have forgotten what watered down reporting they had done earlier. But the human suffering has begun in Japan, and even the Japanese government is trying to pretend it’s not happening.

The curtain is pulled over the total impact of this disaster to protect the nuclear power industry. The government and media blackout has become known as “plume gate” for the radioactive plume that was released from the Fukushima mishap. (http://www.naturalnews.com/035789_Fukushima_Cesium-137_Plume-Gate.html)

The Fukushima reactors were designed by General Electric, and 23 reactors of the USA’s 104 operating reactors are very similar to Fukushima’s. Lately, awareness of nuclear power’s pitfalls is growing and casting a shadow on nuclear power’s illegitimate claim of sustainability and unlimited power.

The suffering has already begun

Thousands of Japanese children from Fukushima and the nearby areas have been diagnosed with cysts and nodules on their thyroid glands. So far, 41.1 percent of 57,000 tested have shown these early warnings of potential thyroid cancer.

Even worse, four out of five Fukushima evacuees have been observed with developing thyroid abnormalities. It’s not just iodide isotopes with their relatively short radioactive half-lives that can penetrate thyroid glands, cesium-37 isotopes with longer half-lives can too. Here’s the shocking truth about radioactive half-life. (http://www.lbl.gov/abc/Basic.html#Half)

However, the official medical line from the head of this research is that maybe they’ve eaten too much seafood or taken too much iodine. It’s also an official decree that the testing be stopped before it begins in other areas of Japan.

 

Even in Tokyo, doctors are reporting dramatically increased incidents of incurable diarrhea, non-stop nose bleeds, and flu-like symptoms. Some parents are becoming activists in Japan to get at the truth and get their childrentreated properly. Children are more easily affected by radiation poisoning.

A Japanese pediatrician even put out a YouTube video asking for outside help since the Japanese government is not helping as they should. (http://enenews.com)

Dr. Christopher Busby, visiting professor at the University of Ulster’s School of Biomedical Sciences and Scientific Secretary of the European Committee on Radiation Risk put out this video about Fukushima. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdvfsBsXNS4)

He’s been attacked. But as a saying goes: “You know you’re getting close to the target when you’re getting flack.” Here’s Busby’s counter attack: http://fukushimaupdate.com

Nuclear power is dangerous no matter how it’s used

Even with flawless operation, the growing problem of where to put power plants’ spent fuel rods, which are actually still very radioactive for centuries, is becoming an issue that’s swept under the rug. Using DU (depleted uranium) for ammunition has been one outlet for nuclear waste.

Depleted uranium is a misleading term. Depleted means it’s not suitable for nuclear reactor use. But it’s still highly radioactive. Uranium metal is extremely hard, and DU is used to on projectiles and bullets in modern warfare because of DU’s ability to penetrate even armor.

When the projectiles hit targets, they explode and a radioactive mist is released into the immediate environment. Even before that, those projectiles tend to ignite and release radioactive materials. These local radioactive mists get into the area’s water and soil and remain for thousands of years.

This has begun in Iraq and elsewhere. These mists can also be carried far away from the immediate areas as radioactive measurements in the UK have demonstrated. In effect, nuclear war has been practiced for decades by the U.S. and its allies by using DU ammunition, which the UN had earlier declared illegal.

A massive underground radioactive waste “tomb” is under construction in Finland. It’s known as Onkalo, and it’s featured in a documentary entitled Into Eternity. Onkalo is only for Finland’s nuclear waste. Sweden and France may follow soon. Will others follow, or is it already too late?

Sources for this article include:

http://enenews.com

http://enenews.com

http://enenews.com

http://enenews.com

 

 

Terrorist Attacks More Than Quadrupled In Decade Since Sept. 11, 2001, Study Finds

org...

 Peter Apps

Reuters
December 5, 2012

The number of terrorist attacks each year has more than quadrupled in the decade since September 11, 2001, a study released on Tuesday said, with Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan the most affected.

The number of annual deaths in attacks, however, peaked in 2007 — the height of the Iraq conflict — and has been falling ever since. The survey reported 7,473 fatalities in 2011, 25 percent down on 2007. That figure included dead suicide bombers and other attackers.

Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, India and Yemen were the five countries most affected by terrorism in descending order, it said, based on a measure giving weightings to number of attacks, fatalities and injuries and level of property damage.

Read full article

600% increase in Australian parents refusing vaccinations for children

org..

Jonathan Benson

Natural News
December 6, 2012

Parents across Australia are waking up in droves to the dangers of vaccines, as evidenced by new government figures showing a major uptick in the number of parents who are choosing not to vaccinate their children. According to the data, there has been a 600 percent increase in recent years in the number of informed vaccine opponents who are simply not willing to inject their offspring with toxic, and largely untested, chemical cocktails.

So many Australian parents are taking charge of their children’s health and making informed vaccination decisions, in fact, the Australian government is now working feverishly to dissuade and re-indoctrinate them back into the vaccine fold. According to 3AW 693 News Talk in Australia, theAustralian Medical Association, along with the Academy of Science, has published a 20-page propaganda pamphlet that attempts to discard all the opposing science against vaccines as “common myths,” and instead reassure everyone that vaccines are perfectly safe.

But people are not buying it, and the establishment “down under” is starting to panic. During a recent interview with talk show host Neil Mitchell, who on numerous occasions has taken the liberty to express his misguided opinion that parents who refuse to vaccinate their children are committing child abuse, Australian Vaccination Network (AVN) President Meryl Dorey explained how her work in presenting the vaccination science often ignored by the mainstream media is helping to shift public opinions.

“We believe that everyone has the right to make an informed decision about vaccination, and that includes having access to both sides of this issue,” said Dorey to a belligerent Mitchell during the segment. “We absolutely oppose any form of compulsory vaccination,” she added, contradicting radical new proposals that childhood vaccines be mandatory.

Mitchell, none too pleased with Dorey’s well-reasoned and logical approach to the vaccination issue, quickly employed common badgering and manipulation techniques in an attempt to put words in Dorey’s mouth and make her appear to be some kind of nutcase. But his feeble attempts were a complete failure, as Dorey successfully pointed out several important, and often omitted, facts about vaccines that simply cannot be refuted.

“We actually have the highest level of vaccination in Australia that we’ve ever had against whooping cough, and the highest level of whooping cough that we’ve ever had,” explained Dorey, debunking the myth that decreased vaccination rates are responsible for the recent comeback of whooping cough in some areas. “We have more whooping cough now than we had since before the vaccine was added to the mass vaccination schedule in 1953.”

You can listen to the full segment with Meryl Dorey here: http://www.3aw.com.au


http://www.3aw.com.au

Sources for this article include:

http://www.naturalnews.com

http://www.naturalnews.com/024218_flu_vaccine.html

Pearl Harbor as a Noble Lie

 Tim Kelly

Infowars.com
December 7, 2012

Soon after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, rumors began to circulate challenging the official narrative that it was an unprovoked surprise attack. The cumulative evidence gathered over the last seventy years by scholars, journalists, and investigators vindicates those suspicious of treachery from the top; for it comprises a solid circumstantial case that Franklin D. Roosevelt and his top advisors deliberately provoked the attack and deliberately looked the other way before it came.

What was the reason for their treachery?

Roosevelt wanted to plunge the United States into the European war on the side of Great Britain but was unsuccessful in provoking Germany in the North Atlantic. So he decided that provoking a Japanese attack upon U.S. military bases in the Pacific would be the best way to achieve that objective. Since Japan was allied with Germany under the Tripartite Pact, Roosevelt calculated a war with Japan would sooner or later bring the United States into the war against Germany.

Most historians when pressed on the matter now grudgingly concede that Roosevelt lied when he told the American people that he would never send their boys to fight into foreign wars, but they excuse his treachery as a “noble lie,” a deception perpetrated against the public by the political elite to achieve a supposed greater good.

The Pearl Harbor noble-lie argument usually goes something like this: “Given the evil of Nazism and the threat that Hitler posed to the world, Roosevelt was justified in maneuvering the United States into a war with Germany.”

Robert Stinnett adopts this view in his book Day of Deceit, where he writes, “I sympathize with the agonizing dilemma faced by President Roosevelt. He was forced to find circuitous means to persuade an isolationist America to join in a fight for freedom.”

The standard justification for U.S. entry into the war is that otherwise Hitler would have defeated Britain and Russia and completed his conquest of Europe. With all the resources of the continent at his disposal, Hitler then would have been able to move against North America to achieve his dream of world domination.

There are several problems with this analysis. First, it greatly underestimates the difficulties of a trans-Atlantic invasion and grossly exaggerates Germany’s military capabilities even when she was at the apex of her power. It also confuses the conditions of December 1941 with those of June 1940. By the time of the Pearl Harbor attack, the fortunes of war were already beginning to turn against Hitler.

Moreover, there is no evidence that Hitler ever entertained plans for world domination. His primary objective was the abrogation of the Treaty of Versailles, which had disarmed Germany and led to her territorial dismemberment. Hitler was determined to reclaim these territories, and although negotiations were his preferred method, he was willing to wage war if necessary. His only overt plans for war involved an anticipated confrontation with Communism and the reacquisition of the “living space” that Russia had ceded to Germany in the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk in 1918.

The outbreak of a general war in Europe was not a part of Hitler’s game plan but a consequence of Britain and France’s declaration of war against Germany after her invasion of Poland on September 1, 1939.

Furthermore, although Hitler’s armies had overrun France in the spring of 1940, total victory was denied to them when the British Expeditionary Force escaped capture at Dunkirk. The defeat of the Luftwaffe in the Battle of Britain forced Hitler to cancel his cross-channel invasion plans. Britain had made it through the darkest hour, and as 1940 drew to a close her survival was essentially assured. As for Hitler, his hopes for a quick end to the war in the West were lost.

Germany’s June 1941 invasion of Russia, Operation Barbarossa, though remarkably successful in its initial stages, had failed by the end of the summer to achieve its primary objective: the destruction of the Red Army. Even as early as August 1941, the failure of the blitzkrieg was apparent, as Roosevelt began receiving reports indicating that Russia would, indeed, hold out. The onset of the Russian winter, the inability of German forces to take Moscow, and a major Russian counteroffensive on December 6 had dashed Hitler’s hopes for victory in 1941 and raised the specter of a mutually exhausting war that was unlikely to end in Germany’s favor.

While the ebb tide against Hitler was greatly assisted by the American Lend-Lease program, the crucial point is that both the British and Russians were able to blunt major German offensives and deliver severe blows to the Nazi war machine without direct U.S. military intervention.

So if U.S. entry into the war was unnecessary to prevent a victory by Nazi Germany in Europe, what remains of the case for Roosevelt’s “noble lie” regarding Pearl Harbor?

Imperial Japan was indeed on the move in East Asia, but it was unclear how that threatened the United States. Roosevelt never explained to the American people why they should be concerned with protecting European colonies in Asia from the Japanese. Moreover, Japan’s desire for a “Co-Prosperity Sphere” of economic and political predominance was hardly unique in a world where France, Britain, and the United States had all carved out spheres of influence. Japan’s crime in the eyes of the Western powers was being a latecomer to the colonial banquet. As one Japanese diplomat wryly remarked, “Just when we learn how to play poker, they change the game to bridge.”

True, Japan could be a cruel colonial master, especially in China. But it should be noted that while Roosevelt was quick to call out the Japanese for their atrocities, the United States had not flinched from resorting to brutal methods to pacify populations in her own colonies (See Alfred W. McCoy’sPolicing America’s Empire).

Some have argued the danger to the United States did not come from Germany or Japan but from the possibility that the two powers, along with Italy, would combine to encircle the western hemisphere. But this view greatly exaggerates the military capacity of the Axis Powers and misrepresents theTripartite Pact, which was a defensive alliance primarily intended to deter U.S. entry into the then-separate conflicts in Asia and Europe. Moreover, Germany and Japan never developed a coordinated military strategy.

Japanese ambitions were viewed by some geostrategists as a threat to U.S. naval operations in the Pacific and contrary to America’s long-term economic interests in the region. Such concerns are telling; for they betray a presumption of imperial entitlement that casts the Pacific war in a very different light than the standard historical account. Rather than being the crusade for freedom, the war begins to resemble a realpolitik clash of two mercantilist empires. Some have also suggested that American sentimentalism towards China and the hope for a restoration of the Open Door Policy were important in determining Roosevelt’s policies towards Japan.

But these were only contributing factors that facilitated Roosevelt’s drive to war. The lodestar of U.S. foreign policy in 1941 was entry into the European war against Germany. Frustrated by Hitler’s forbearance in the North Atlantic in the face of repeated provocation by U.S. warships, Roosevelt looked to the Pacific as the back door to war in Europe.

The standard history treats U.S. entry into World War II as moral and strategic imperative. But as demonstrated above, that assessment does not bear careful scrutiny. Nazi Germany was not about to conquer the world, nor was she in any position to threaten the United States. Indeed, Hitler’s bid for continental supremacy had been thwarted by Britain and Russia long before the United States entered the war. Imperial Japan was bogged down on the Asian mainland, hungry for raw materials, and anxious for a modus vivendi with the United States.

This history also ignores the enormous costs and horrifying consequences of direct American intervention. The Anglo-American bombings of German and Japanese cities killed more than a million civilians, most of whom were women and children. Most of the destruction in Western Europe occurred during the period of Allied liberation in 1944–1945 (See William Hitchcock’s The Bitter Road to Freedom: A New History of the Liberation of Europe). And the decision by President Truman to drop atomic bombs on a prostrate Japan in August 1945 accelerated a nuclear-arms race that still threatens the incineration of the world.

On the eve of the Pearl Harbor attack, most Americans believed that there should be no large standing armies and that their government should heed George Washington’s admonition to steer clear of foreign entanglements. They ruefully remembered President Wilson’s “war to end all wars” and were in no mood for another crusade to “make the world safe for democracy.” That is why on December 6, 1941, the vast majority of Americans still opposed entering the war.

Pearl Harbor transformed the nation. The American people were outraged over Japan’s diabolical “sneak attack” and marched off to fight “the Good War.” A vast military-industrial complex was developed to stock the “arsenal of democracy.” After the war, more noble lies were told to justify a permanent national-security state, and the United States became the globe-girdling empire it is today; corrupt, bankrupt, bellicose, and shrouded in secrecy.

In his introduction to the Pentagon Papers, Mike Gravel quoted the British novelist and historian H.G. Wells:

The true strength of rulers and empires lies not in armies or emotions, but in the belief of men that they are inflexibly open and truthful and legal. As soon as government departs from that standard, it ceases to be anything more than “the gang in possession,” and its days are numbered.

Remember that quote when you come across Roosevelt apologists excusing his treachery as a “noble lie” and praising him for his foresight and statesmanship. Deceit is neither praiseworthy nor noble.

This article was first published by the Future of Freedom Foundation.

...
Obama the Joker
Translate
 
Flag Counter

free counters

 

 

Creeper

Creeper